I am a rule follower. I have always been a rule follower. But I am also independent, resilient, and stubborn. I like to do new things and expand my knowledge. So, in the summer of 2019, I set out to write a book.
Drafting the book was an adventure. A jumbled journey of ups and downs; pride and despair. I fought
self-doubt and imposter syndrome. And still do. But I am now to the next stage
of the process: pursuing publication.
There are three paths I am considering: traditional-, hybrid-, and self-publishing. Each path has pros and cons, and I have much to learn. It is both frightening and exhilarating.
*
If I want to go the traditional route, which is the Holy Grail for most writers, I must get an agent. The agent is the first in a series of gatekeepers within the realm of publishing. They are hired to put my needs and desires as an author first, and to promote my work through an intricate courting process to big-time publishers, who only accept agented submissions. I’m sure you know some of them by name: HarperCollins; Penguin Random House; Simon & Schuster. But—and this is a big but—the agent must choose me as a client. Therefore, I have sent passionate letters to multiple agents in hopes of enticing them to love me.
Have you ever gone about ‘looking
for love?’ Yeah, kind of…... counterintuitive.
Hybrid-publishing is like ‘a la cart’
for writers in a single location. They have teams of professionals in all areas
needed to publish a well-constructed and marketable book, but with the author
footing the bill. Hybrids differ from vanity presses. A hybrid press has a
submission and acceptance process, cares about the author’s success and the quality
of the book. A vanity press will take any work presented and throw it - as is -
between two covers, without any quality control, if the author has the capital
to front the book.
The self-publishing route requires
or allows, depending on your perspective, the author to do everything
themselves. Essentially, they hire independent contractors: an editor,
proofreader, typesetter, cover designer, formatter, to name a few, then submits
the work to a publisher facilitator, like Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or Apple
Press.
In all cases, the author is
responsible for marketing, or at least a portion of it.
Ah, marketing, the bane of many an
author’s existence. (Yes, I am purposefully using clichés.) That will be
another post entirely.
So, as you can see—if you’ve read
this far—it’s quite a decision. And process.
*
When I completed my manuscript, I immediately began sending out query letters to agents, because that’s what I was supposed to do. I am utilizing the tools specifically designed to assist me in my search, like QueryTracker, but so far, I have not enticed the attention of an agent.
Yet.
When I do, if I do, I will
certainly post about it here. But during this process, I have rewritten or
edited my query letter dozens of times. I participated in #PITMAD and began
sending queries to small, independent publishers who do not require agented
submissions. I wrote a respectable synopsis and am knee-deep in completing a
proposal. Again, the rule follower toeing the line.
*
Why, pray-tell, am I telling you all of this? Because part of acquiring the attention of an agent and publisher is being active on social media and engaging readers.
And yes, as I have made clear, I am
a rule follower.
Beyond that, having readers is the
only way I will succeed in my latest adventure.
And that’s you.
I need you.
So please, subscribe to this blog to receive email alerts about
new posts. And read them. Then leave a comment telling me what you think. Tell
me if you can relate. Or just tell me how your day is going.
As for me, I am heading back to the
querying trenches.
